Sun officials on Wednesday announced plans to purchase Sweden-based MySQL. The company says it expects to profit from the acquisition by providing support for open source technology users and up-selling them on other Sun products.
A combined Sun and MySQL could pose a serious threat to the likes of Oracle over the long term, even if the potential price war never happens, according to Tony Iams, a vice president and senior analyst at Ideas International, of Port Chester, N.Y.
MySQL is currently popular with SMBs, Iams said, but small companies often become big companies over time.
"MySQL appeals to a specific set of customers that might not have a lot of demands, but as the demands of those customers increase, the product [could] gradually get more sophisticated and break into the [high-end] market that way," Iams explained. "MySQL is a disrupter that Oracle might not have to worry about now, but 10 to 15 years down the road, I think that it could be a different picture."
MySQL should have no trouble hanging onto its SMB customer base even as those companies grow, Iams said, mainly because migrating off any database technology is usually a highly expensive undertaking.
"If you have a viable database business, it's a great business to be in because there are very few businesses in which the lock on the customer is stronger," he said. "The more dependent you become on a database, the more risky it becomes to switch."
A prime example of this phenomenon occurred a few years ago, Iams said, when a major Wall Street firm considered migrating off IBM's Information Management System (IMS).
"IMS is a 1960s-era database, and they thought it would be a good idea to move to something more modern," he said. "But when they commissioned a study to determine the total cost of switching, the price tag was more than a billion dollars."