Their concerns are understandable given Oracle's track record and the fact that
IT industry analysts wouldn't be surprised by an Oracle counteroffer, either. "There's a possibility Oracle may do this to defend their base," said Ray Wang, a principal analyst with Cambridge, Mass.-based Forrester Research Inc. "I believe [Oracle co-presidents Charles Phillips and Safra Katz] have this contingency scenario planned out. However, the $7.5 [billion] to $8 billion required to outbid [SAP] could be better used for acquisitions
Requires Free Membership to View
in other verticals that will ultimately surround SAP."
But while Oracle and its founder, Larry Ellison, have a reputation for buying out the competition, many agree that a counteroffer probably won't happen this time, primarily because Oracle already gained a bigger slice of the BI software market when it
More on the SAP-Business Objects deal:
![]()
![]()
![]()
"It's not like all of a sudden Business Objects just became a competitive offering [for Oracle]," said Tony Baer, principal of onStrategies, a New York-based IT market research and consulting firm. "Before this deal it was a competitive offering because Oracle already bought into this space. So I don't think the deal changes things that much -- maybe just by a matter of degrees -- in that now there's going to be a little bit more of a grudge match."
Baer added that following the acquisition, SAP will undoubtedly try to woo Oracle customers over to SAP as it always has, but he doesn't anticipate a major shift in sales numbers resulting from the buy.
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation