Reshaping Your Business with Web 2.0
Chapter 9: Putting Web 2.0 to Use in the Enterprise: Higher Value from Greater Participation
This chapter from Reshaping Your Business with Web 2.0 explains what Web 2.0 means for the enterprise, In this section, get tips for Web 2.0 success and setting Web 2.0 goals and guidelines for your business in the enterprise .
Table of contents:
Web 2.0 users, community and participation in the enterprise
Enterprise search and links for Web 2.0
Enterprise Web 2.0 blogs, wikis and content management
Tips for Web 2.0 success and setting Web 2.0 goals in the enterprise
New Web 2.0 tools: Beyond the basics
Know Your Goals
The guidelines outlined so far are generic and address typical pitfalls, fears, and
risks associated with just about any endeavor pertaining to bringing Web 2.0
into the enterprise. Let's get more specific. Many flavors and possible angles and
potential goals are present in such initiatives. One of the first steps involved is to
make a clear assessment of scope and its implications.
The goal is not merely to scale down the greater Web into the firewall. Instead,
deploying each initiative requires answering a few questions: Where does this
service naturally live, and who are its users? Is it meant exclusively for the
intranet? Is it meant as an outbound or outreach medium? Or, with a majority
of services, does it really belong at the intersection where internal and external
concerns mesh?
While it might be tempting to try and bypass several iterations in one go and
lay out a sophisticated, fine-grained access control model that accommodates a
wide set of participants, with visibility into various documents and with various
permissions, it might also be daunting enough to derail the effort. It's interesting
to note that, even in the case of public social networks, the learning curve has
been progressive. Successful networking services have started with simple models
that gained traction and ramped up the complexity of their privacy and sharing
controls, all along educating their users and allowing them ample time to pick
up the new features. And even then, defaults widely prevail, with most users not
bothering to tweak the access controls they enforce on their information or going
with all-or-nothing approaches.
Consider internal efforts, such as intranet wikis or blogs. At the highest
level, the goal of rolling out such tools is to improve productivity through better
information sharing. Setting up an internal environment is easy, even if the
organization takes steps to ensure that the newly introduced platform plays nice
with existing single-sign-on schemes, company directories, or social networks. But
eliciting participation takes more than simply stating that switching from e-mail
or shared file systems to wikis will help achieve productivity gains. It's important
that the enterprise articulate those expected gains in terms that relate to the specific
"pain points" in the company. That means surveying and understanding the
perceived needs for better information sharing, recognizing factors that prevent
its smooth dissemination, and identifying who are the likely early adopters, the
likely champions of an initiative aimed at streamlining those flows. These are the
people who will be willing to change their current toolsets to eliminate friction
and replication. The strongest advocates are likely those who have been exposed
to and are users of streamlined and social tools, who perceive being confined to
e-mail as a step back. This is why McAfee claims that one of the characteristics
of successful deployment of Web 2.0 in the enterprise is to engage lots of young
people who consider sharing on social networks to be the norm.
For projects aimed at outreach, such as participation in the blogosphere or
social networking sites, the key point is simultaneously to nurture an authentic
voice and to engage with an existing community of customers. This combined with
the need to establish clear, tool-agnostic policies in terms of authoring will help
employees feel empowered and informed when it comes to contributing.
Web 2.0 Culture: Success Enablers
 |
| More on this book |
| This chapter is excerpted from the book, Reshaping Your Business with Web 2.0, authored by Vince Casarez, Billy Cripe, Jean Sini and Philipp Weckerle, published by McGraw-Hill Osborne Media, September, 2008. ISBN 0071600787. |
|
|
 |
 |
Long-term sustainability for the competitive enterprise implies an evolution toward
pull-based business models, in which customers aren't merely consumers of products but are participants in a community involved in designing the products.
This means the enterprise must ensure an open, porous environment, where actors
inside and out are loosely but frequently connecting and collaborating. It pays
to ensure that, even in the early stages of rolling out outbound Web 2.0 efforts
such as blogs, employees are aware that they are not merely writing, but starting
conversations with their users.
When it comes to choosing and implementing the various solutions, Dion
Hinchcliffe at ZDNet coined a useful acronym of desired characteristics in a Web
2.0 solution: FLATNESSES, derived from an earlier version by McAfee, SLATES.
What does the revised mnemonic stand for?
- Free-form Emphasizing ease of use and egalitarian permissions, freeform
tools not only foster participation but also enable users who were not
originally anticipated to participate when rolling them out.
- Links Promoting links is crucial as the unit of exchange and are of value
in helping create connections and enabling structure to appear.
- Authorship The premise in Web 2.0 is to be inclusive, to provide access
to every employee to easy publishing tools that facilitate participation.
- Tagging As opposed to folder hierarchies, tags allow folksonomies to
evolve naturally and let users slice information along multiple dimensions.
- Network-oriented Corollary to the promotion of links, it is critical to
make as much content as possible web-addressable, to have web-centric
applications mediate as many exchanges as possible. This not only
allows users to discover content through links, but supports the reuse of
information without a need to replicate it, e-mail–style.
- Extensions McAfee refers to extensions of knowledge by extracting
patterns, by mining activity to derive implicit behaviors. You can also
interpret extensions as the ability for the system to mutate from having
mashups and widgets interoperate, reusing data under different guises and
perspectives, extending its reach and value.
- Search Search is the key to discovery and thus to augmented value for
the information held in the system, to accelerated circulation, and to lower
replication.
- Social At least some of the tools in the ecosystem need to allow weak
ties to thrive beyond the static group of the organization chart. Along with fomenting discovery of ad hoc connections and similarity in interests, they enable low-key interactions, push-based status updates (Twitter-style), and
profiles, and thus foster a climate of trust, collaboration, and participation.
- Emergence Emergence supports organic structures to build over
time from the content—as opposed to predefined, rigid categories—by
leveraging taxonomies, implicit behaviors, votes, bookmarks, tags, and
other linking patterns.
- Signals No longer solely dependent on e-mail, tools use subscriptionbased
signals such as RSS feeds and mobile devices to update interested
parties about new or modified materials.
These characteristics constitute powerful and helpful guidelines for assessing
the quality and appropriateness of a service or tool for a collaborative initiative,
and for determining how well it complements and integrates with existing
solutions. But even more generic principles are worth considering. These straddle
both technology and culture and are early indicators of success. In particular,
one need is to emphasize ease of use above feature-richness, especially early
on. It might be possible to roll out new features over time, but a steep and timeconsuming
learning curve is a deterrent to significant adoption.
In addition, executive support is important—beyond merely paying lipservice
to the initiative or lecturing the rank-and-file about the need to embrace
this or that tool. A cultural change is required of everyone in the company, and
executives must lead by example and illustrate what it means to open up and
participate, whether by spending time contributing to blogs or otherwise breaking
the boundaries of the targeted information silos. The executives' own actions
and continued support will be more telling and more beneficial to any Web 2.0
initiative than their original stamp of approval on a product rollout.
Cultural hurdles are also encountered when fostering participation through
establishing an environment of trust and openness. This is also driven by example.
A key success factor is to make sure at least some of the tools deployed are
explicitly social, allowing the organic social fabric to be exposed and thrive, and
ultimately to be leveraged, as contributors gain more confidence sharing with their
collaborators.
Finally, in addition to champions and early adopters, an early set of users
willing to spend the cycles needed to tend to the new space should be identified.
These users will be available to iterate over versions of the evolving knowledge
being built, similar to how Wikipedia has dedicated volunteers who tend to its
content.
Download the chapter " Putting Web 2.0 to Use in the Enterprise: Higher Value from Greater Participation " in PDF form.
Continue to the next section: New Web 2.0 tools: Beyond the basics