|
Yes and no. Yes, it's really the same.
No, because there is no such thing as a "key" other than
a primary or foreign key.
So a composite primary key is simply a primary key
which consists of more than one column. None of those
columns is a "key" in its own right. (The only thing
to watch out for is that none of them may be null.)
Perhaps the confusion arises from the
use of the word "key" to describe what is really an index.
An index on a table is totally separate from, and unrelated to,
the primary key. It is unfortunate, in my opinion,
that the popular database MySQL allows you to use the keyword KEY
as a synonym for the keyword INDEX. Why they chose to allow this is
anybody's guess. Perhaps they didn't realize the confusion
between indexes and primary keys that this was bound to create.
One thing to keep in mind when designing database tables is that
an index is a physical construct, and is used for performance.
Primary and foreign keys, on the other hand, are logical
constructs, and are defined with only one thing in mind --
to ensure the relational integrity of the data.
See also my previous answers,
Questions about primary keys 05 April 2002, and
What is a primary key? Composite PK? Foreign key? Tuple?
27 February 2002
|
