My guess is that most database projects are in third normal form. Why do I say this? Because I have seen thousands...
of database designs, and most of them are constructed quite well, by conscientious database designers, with due regard for functional dependencies—even though they might not know what "functional dependencies" are, they still manage to do it correctly.
Most SQL tutorials and references suggest that you should strive to attain third normal form. Here's a quick rundown on the first three normal forms:
First normal form (1NF) has two requirements: that there be a primary key, and that no column shall contain more than one value.
Second normal form (2NF) requires that all non-key columns are fully dependent on the entire primary key. If the table has only a single-column primary key, this requirement is easily met.
Third normal form (3NF) requires that there are no transitive dependencies, where one column depends on another column which depends on the primary key.
Normal forms are also inclusive. In other words, to be in 2NF, a design must already be in 1NF, and to be in 3NF it must already be in 2NF. Almost all database designers are trying to achieve 3NF, and most make it. Some consciously denormalize their design for a specific reason, but this occurs infrequently.
And yes, there are even higher normal forms, but very few designers take their designs that far. So the most common normal form is 3NF.
Related Q&A from Rudy Limeback
Read about the Mimer Validator, a tool used to verify your SQL code, in this tip from SQL expert Rudy Limeback.continue reading
Read an example of an SQL case expression from our SQL expert Rudy Limeback.continue reading
Read SQL expert Rudy Limeback's advice for counting combinations in a table with SQL's GROUP BY clausecontinue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.