Which one is better for performance as unique index, varchar or number? I have peculiar requirements where my unique...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
key is varchar(6) something like "006500," which is used in many other tables as foreign key. I was wondering which can give me better performance in this case -- defining one numeric unique ID number and using this as foreign key in other tables? Because in the last case i need to make two queries first to retrieve unique ID number and then on other table where it is foreign key to retrieve the value I need, while in the first case I can make query directly to the foreign key table.
In all my years of working with databases, I have never once worried about whether an index on VARCHAR2 or NUMBER columns performs better. If I have a number, and I will be performing some sort of numerical calculations on it, then I would never store this as a character string in the column. And unless I had a specific reason to do otherwise, I would store the value as a NUMBER datatype even if I am not performing calculations on it. Many times I have gone into database design thinking I was not going to perform calculations on a field and then had to change that idea in the future. I would store your data as a NUMBER because that is the proper datatype for the data. But I still am not thinking of performance reasons here. Any performance differences are likely to be so miniscule as to go unnoticed.
Dig Deeper on Oracle database design and architecture
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.