NAS or SAN for Oracle Fail Safe

Should Oracle Fail Safe be implemented with network-attached storage (NAS) devices or a storage area network (SAN)?

A client is implementing Oracle Fail Safe. They want to know it if it should be implemented with network-attached storage (NAS) devices or a storage area network (SAN). Do you have any recommendations?
In either case, you want to make sure that you have a good relationship with your disk vendor so that you can sort out any potential disk issues.

Network-attached storage (NAS) devices have suffered from some serious flaws as far as Oracle is concerned. The...

Oracle database needs to be in near-constant contact with the database datafiles. Network glitches could cause the database to lose contact with those datafiles and cause the database to crash. Many DBAs find this unacceptable and won't even consider use NAS devices for their Oracle Databases. However, one of the more popular NAS vendors, NetApp now has some devices that work well with Oracle. Just make sure that your disk vendor will support Oracle on your NAS disk devices, otherwise, don't even bother with them.

Storage area networks (SAN) are much better and don't have the same problems. While technically on a "network," these devices should be placed on a dedicated switch for your SAN.

This was first published in April 2004

Dig Deeper on Oracle database design and architecture

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.



Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: