Q
Problem solve Get help with specific problems with your technologies, process and projects.

# Detail rows for accounts that occur three times

## Our SQL expert answers a tough query using both the IN subquery and derived tables.

I have a table with weekly data:
```    WeekEnding   Amt   Acct
----------  ----   ----
2007-10-06  5.00   XYZ
2007-10-13  3.00   XYZ
2007-10-20  0.23   XYZ
2007-10-06  5.00   ZZZ
2007-10-13  0.23   ZZZ
```
I want all of the accounts and amounts for accounts that occur in at least three different week ending dates. Can you help?

The difficulty with this type of problem is that it requires returning detail rows for a situation which is easily...

solved with HAVING. However, to use HAVING we have to use GROUP BY, and then the detail rows are aggregated. The way to approach this problem is to break it down into components. The first component of the solution does involve the HAVING clause.

```select Acct
from Weekly
group
by Acct
having count(*) >= 3```

Note that COUNT(DISTINCT WeekEnding) also works. Whether we use this or the simpler COUNT(*) depends on whether the combination of WeekEnding and Acct is unique. Counting distinct values may be necessary if, for example, there are other columns you didn't mention, such as customer. In that case, we might have one row per customer per account per week ending date, so COUNT(DISTINCT WeekEnding) is necessary if the GROUP BY is only on the account.

Now that we know which accounts qualify, we can build the other component, which is the selection of all detail rows for the accounts which qualify. This can be accomplished in two ways. The first method uses an IN subquery:

```select WeekEnding
, Amt
, Acct
from Weekly
where Acct in
( select Acct
from Weekly
group
by Acct
having count(*) >= 3 )```

The second method uses the same subquery but as a derived table in the FROM clause:

```select WeekEnding
, Amt
, Acct
from Weekly
inner
join ( select Acct
from Weekly
group
by Acct
having count(*) >= 3 ) as ok_accts
on ok_accts.Acct = Weekly.Acct```

What is the difference between these two solutions? As far as execution goes, they should perform the same. But the derived table has an advantage. Suppose that if, instead of one column, the HAVING condition needed to be based on a GROUP BY involving two columns. What if you wanted details for all customer accounts that occurred at least 3 times?

The first solution would be:

```select WeekEnding
, Amt
, Acct
, Customer
from Weekly
where ( Acct, Customer ) in
( select Acct
, Customer
from Weekly
group
by Acct
, Customer
having count(*) >= 3 )```

This solution now uses what is called a row constructor, and this is perfectly valid SQL. The problem with row constructors is that not every database engine supports them. Yet.

Now imagine what the query involving the join to the derived table would look like.

This was last published in December 2007

## Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

#### Have a question for an expert?

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

#### Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

## SearchDataManagement

In big data news, we find Google TPUs, or Tensor Processing Units, offered as a cloud service, while LinkedIn is open sourcing a ...

• ### Hyperledger Fabric offers path to enterprise blockchain future

Blockchain arose from bitcoin, but it's looking to find a place in the enterprise. Frameworks like Hyperledger Fabric could ...

• ### MongoDB 4.0 takes ACID transactions to multi-document level

MongoDB is taking a deeper step into SQL-style processing waters with a 4.0 update that brings increased support for ...

• ### Tableau vs. Qlik Sense: Pros and cons of the rival analytics tools

Products from the two top data visualization vendors are starting to resemble each other as the need for strong visualizations ...

• ### AI functionality limited today but could be a game-changer

Limited AI capabilities could soon give way to technology that is truly transformative for enterprises, surpassing the overhyped ...

## SearchSAP

SAP paid \$2.4 billion to acquire lead-to-money vendor CallidusCloud, and analysts agree that the significant price may be worth ...

• ### SAP's Barry Padgett on future of SAP Ariba Network

In this Q&A, new SAP Ariba President Barry Padgett discusses the future of procurement and the experience he will bring to Ariba ...

• ### Avoiding SAP indirect access woes requires good faith

Some customers are concerned that SAP will hit them for indirect access licensing fees, but they can avoid trouble if they act in...

## SearchSQLServer

SQL Operations Studio simplifies routine administration of SQL Server and Azure SQL databases, making database development and ...

• ### Meltdown and Spectre fixes eyed for SQL Server performance issues

Microsoft has responded to the Spectre and Meltdown chip vulnerabilities with patches and other fixes. But IT teams need to sort ...

• ### Five SQL Server maintenance steps you should take -- ASAP

Putting off SQL Server administration tasks can lead to database problems. Enact these often-neglected maintenance items to help ...

## TheServerSide.com

• ### IBM hones in on AI talent at developer confab

IBM and others target developers interested in building artificial intelligence applications, as the number of skilled AI ...

• ### How DevOps concepts eluted from cloud computing and service platforms

The popularity of DevOps can be traced back to the emergence of cloud computing. As programmers began scripting their ...

• ### Pluralsight IQ, Stack Overflow boost developer street cred

Tying the Pluralsight IQ skills test to the Stack Overflow Developer Story helps developers measure their technical skills and ...

## SearchDataCenter

• ### IBM Power9 servers seek market inroads to AI, cloud

IBM follows up its first Power9 server with a raft of systems designed to appeal to a wider array of markets -- most notably, AI ...

• ### Evaluate read-intensive and write-intensive SSD use cases

Consider write wear, performance and other factors when choosing between read-intensive, write-intensive and mixed-use ...

• ### Some hyper-converged infrastructure use cases pose pitfalls

Hyper-converged infrastructure adoption is skyrocketing, but that doesn't mean that the technology is the best choice for every ...

## SearchContentManagement

• ### Content management in the cloud a main theme in 2018

The future of content management resides in the cloud and with AI, as several 2018 conferences will assure you.

• ### Six things to know about today's SharePoint implementations

As companies migrate their on-premises Microsoft SharePoint sites to the cloud, here are some things they should know about the ...

• ### Upgrades for the SharePoint Online portal

As more organizations migrate SharePoint sites to the cloud, Microsoft has increased at-a-glance dashboard data and analytics to ...

## SearchHRSoftware

• ### Worksite health services providers on the rise

Employers are turning to workplace health vendors to provide on-site healthcare services to workers to reduce healthcare costs ...

• ### Federal HR applications need a makeover, Trump administration says

U.S. government HR systems are heavily customized and out-of-date. They can't share data effectively, crimping the use of people ...

• ### AI-enabled recruitment management systems seek out bias

Software for recruiters is seen as a tool in identifying hiring bias and improving diversity. The goal is to improve ...

Close